Hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS) is a sporadic disease characterized by hemolytic anemia, sudden or gradual onset of thrombocytopenia, acute kidney injury (AKI), and/or extra-renal end organ damage.1,2 HUS is indicated by thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) on histological examination.3,4 More than 90% of HUS cases are known to be triggered by infection with Shiga-like toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC-HUS) and carry a good prognosis.5 On the other hand, patients with non-STEC-HUS tend to have poor prognosis indicators and high morbidity and mortality rates.6 If left untreated, there is a lifelong risk of kidney dysfunction, end-stage kidney disease, extra-renal complications, and premature death.
We have previously reported that most Omani HUS cases we encountered had associated STEC-HUS infections.7 We also found the local HUS population to be young, mostly male, and only 25% having known medical comorbidities at the time of presentation. Most of these patients also presented with AKI requiring dialysis, of which peritoneal dialysis was the mainstay of extant therapeutic modality. If renal replacement therapy was required, the mean duration and recovery time was almost a month in this population.7
Atypical HUS (aHUS) is an aggressive, lethal, and global disease, classified as a rare genetic disorder that stems from an inappropriate stimulation of the complement system.8 It is termed ‘atypical’ owing to the absence of an activating event similar to that for the conventional HUS, such as Shiga-like toxin. Though aHUS can occur or manifest at any age, it predominately affects children and young adults.9
The fundamental pathophysiology of aHUS is uncontrolled stimulation of the complement pathway, which affects various vascular beds.10 A quarter of patients succumb to death in the acute phase, and up to half progress to end-stage kidney disease, which is exacerbated by dysregulation leading to glomerular endothelial cell damage.11 Up to 48% of patients may present with extrarenal manifestations with frequent neurologic and cardiovascular involvements. However, early diagnosis and prompt treatment can improve the prognoses of aHUS patients.12
Dysregulation of the alternative pathways of the complement system at various stages is a crucial part of the pathogenesis of aHUS.13 The complement system, a part of the innate immune system, can be triggered through its three pathways: classical, alternative, and lectin pathways.4,8,9,11 These three complement tracks congregate at the cleavage and activation of the fundamental complement component 3 (C3) protein. The initiation of the alternative pathway is securely controlled by numerous circulating and cell-bound complement regulatory proteins. Normally, an energy equilibrium exists between complement activation and inactivation.4,8,9,11 Genetic alterations play a role in such activation, and almost half of the aHUS-affected people carry mutations in complement genes.13–14 The loss-of-function mutations in regulators such as complement factor H (CFH), complement factor I (CFI), membrane cofactor protein, and thrombomodulin (THBD); and gain-of-function mutations in the key complement components C3 and complement factor B (CFB) increase the vulnerability to aHUS.13–15 The genotype-phenotype relationships of aHUS have clinical implications for predicting kidney recovery and positive
transplant results.16,17
It is essential to report validated cases of aHUS cases in as many populations as possible because different populations and ethnicities may have differing responses to the same disease or its triggering factors due to genetic, environmental, and lifestyle variations.18 There is a dearth of research on aHUS among the populations in the Arabian Gulf countries including Oman. Therefore, this study aimed to retrospectively evaluate the clinical and laboratory findings related to the aHUS cases diagnosed and treated in Oman over an 11-year period.
Methods
This retrospective descriptive cohort study evaluated cases of all adults and children with the clinical diagnosis of aHUS during the 12-year period from January 2008 to December 2019, who were diagnosed and treated at the country’s two main tertiary care centers, the Royal Hospital (RH) and Sultan Qaboos University Hospital (SQUH). Being the only centers in Oman equipped to diagnose and provide comprehensive care for a spectrum of aHUS cases, they receive referrals from all parts of the country.
For this study, HUS was defined by the triad of hemolytic anemia, thrombocytopenia, and AKI; aHUS were suspected in all patients with typical history but with negative stool cultures for Shiga-like toxin and normal ADAMTS13 activity above 10%. We excluded patients with Shiga-toxin-related HUS and secondary TMA. The electronic medical records of patient demographics, clinical characteristics, and laboratory tests including genetic analysis and histopathological tests were extracted from the respective hospital’s information system, pertaining to the time of initial presentation, three months thereafter, and at the last follow-up, for renal outcome or death.
As per the protocol followed by SQUH and RH, renal biopsies were submitted for light microscopy, immunofluorescence, and electron microscopy. For light microscopy, hematoxylin and eosin stain, periodic acid-Schiff and Jones silver stain (performed at three levels), and Miller's elastic stain were used. The immunofluorescence panel includes immunoglobulin (Ig) A, IgG, IgM, C3, C1q, kappa, and lambda. The molecular genetic testing is conducted using next-generation sequencing gene panels in Clinical Pathology Accreditation, College of American Pathologists, and/or Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments-accredited diagnostic molecular genetics laboratories as per established protocol.
As per the patient records, the following genes were fully sequenced: CFH, CFI, CD46, C3, CFB, and multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification in CFH, CFHR1, and CFHR3 (Northern Genetics Service, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK, for four patients). Full gene sequencing, including 10 bp of flanking intronic sequences and deletion/duplication analysis, was included in the analyses of the following genes: ADAMTS13, C3, CD46, CFB, CFH, CFHR1, CFHR2, CFHR4, CFHR5, CFI, DGKE, PIGA, and THBD (Fulgent, Temple City, CA, USA, for four patients), and ADAMTS13, C3, CD46, CFB, CFH, CFHR1, CFHR2, CFHR3, CFHR5, CFI, DGKE, MMACHC, PIGA, PLG, and THBD (Cento gene, Rostock, Germany, for three patients).
We have reported the descriptive statistics as frequencies and percentages for categorical variables. Continuous variables were described as median and ranges or as mean and SDs. P-values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. All statistical calculations were performed with the STATA 13 software (version 13.0, Stata Corp, College Station, Texas 77845, USA).
This study was approved by the medical research ethical committees of SQUH and RH (Ref. SQU- EC/153/18MREC1772, RH SRC 58/2018).
Results
The subjects of this study were 19 patients diagnosed with aHUS. All patients were Omani nationals, with a median age of 25.0 years (0.1–69.0). Twelve (63.2%) patients were adults, and 11 (57.9%) were male. None had any family history of aHUS. The majority (78.9%) of the patients presented during the acute phase of the disease. Only four (21.1%) cases had clinical evidence of chronicity at presentation. In 13 (68.4%) patients, a trigger factor was identified. More details are in Table 1.
Table 1: Demographic and clinical data of Omani patients with atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (N = 19).
Median age, years
|
25.0 (range: 0.1–69.0)
|
Omani nationality
|
19 (100)
|
Sex
|
|
Male
|
11 (57.9)
|
Female
|
8 (42.1)
|
Comorbid disease
|
|
Diabetes mellitus
|
2 (10.5)
|
Hypertension
|
12 (63.2)
|
Obesity
|
5 (26.3)
|
Clinical presentation
|
|
Acute
|
15 (78.9)
|
Chronic
|
4 (21.1)
|
Trigger factors
|
13 (68.4)
|
Infections
|
11 (84.6)
|
Gastroenteritis
|
6 (46.2)
|
Rickettsia
|
1 (7.7)
|
Escherichia coli
|
1 (7.7)
|
Upper respiratory tract infection
|
2 (18)
|
Mycoplasma plasma
|
1 (9)
|
Postpartum
|
2 (15.4)
|
Post-kidney transplant
|
3 (23.1)
|
Antiphospholipid
|
1 (7.7)
|
The frequencies of extra-renal manifestations are shown in Table 2. The central nervous system manifestations included seizure and encephalopathy in six (31.6%) cases each and stroke in two (10.5%) cases. Ocular manifestations (such as optic atrophy) were found in three (15.8%) cases. Cardiovascular manifestations were found in two (10.5%) cases. Additionally, there was one case with global hyperkinesia suggestive of dilated cardiomyopathy and another one with mitral regurgitation. Elevated liver enzymes were present in five (26.3%) patients. One patient at presentation was found to have liver cirrhosis with portal vein thrombosis. Another patient presented with extensive deep vein thrombosis of the lower extremities. There were no cases of pancreatitis.
Table 2: The frequency of clinical and laboratory data of Omani patients with atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome on presentation (N = 19).
Clinical data
|
|
Seizure
|
6 (31.6)
|
Encephalopathy
|
6 (31.6)
|
Stroke
|
2 (10.5)
|
Ocular manifestation
|
3 (15.8)
|
Cardiopulmonary
|
2 (10.5)
|
High blood pressure
|
12 (63.2)
|
Diffuse vasculitis
|
2 (10.5)
|
AKI
|
17 (89.5)
|
CKD
|
3 (15.8)
|
Laboratory data
|
|
Anemia
|
18 (94.7)
|
Fragmented RBCs (schistocytes)
|
18 (94.7)
|
Thrombocytopenia
|
18 (94.7)
|
Blood film (toxic granulation)
|
6 (31.6)
|
Proteinuria
|
18 (94.7)
|
AKI: acute kidney injury; CKD: chronic kidney disease; RBC: red blood cell.
Table 3 compares the changes in patient parameters between presentation and three months follow-up. The triad of hemolytic anemia, AKI, and thrombocytopenia was present in most of the cases at the time of presentation. AKI with anemia was present in all cases, with a median creatinine level of 358 umol/L (range = 45–1040) and a median hemoglobin level of 8.0 g/dL (4.1–10.9). All patients had elevated lactate dehydrogenase with a median of 570 u/L (245–2991) and a low haptoglobin median of 28 u/L (10–150). Thrombocytopenia was present in 18 (94.7%) cases with a median of 79 fl (22–180). Severe thrombocytopenia of ≤ 30 was identified in three (15.8%) cases. The majority (63.1%) of the patients presented with high blood pressure with moderate to severe AKI. Ten (52.6%) of those who presented with severe AKI required dialysis. Proteinuria and microscopic hematuria were present in 18 (94.7%) patients with a median of 387.0 mg/mmol (31.1–858.3). Nephrotic range proteinuria was reported in five (26.3%) patients. The complement activity assay for both C3 and C4 was reported in 18 (94.7%) patients. Six (31.6%) patients had low C3 levels with a median value of 927 mg/L (113–1370), and C4 activity with a median of 226.5 mg/L (150.0–423.0). Upon follow-up, persistently low C3 level was found in only 20.0% of patients.
Table 3: The median of the laboratory parameters of Omani patients with atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome at the time of presentation and at three months follow-up (N = 19).
Bilirubin, umol/L
|
17
|
4–78
|
7
|
4–27
|
ALT, U/L
|
18
|
5–253
|
12
|
5–189
|
ALP, U/L
|
78
|
42–588
|
80
|
45–269
|
Albumin, g/L
|
31
|
20–40
|
39
|
26–50
|
C-reactive protein, mg/L
|
29.1
|
2.3–94.2
|
9
|
0.4–20.0
|
Urea, mmol/L
|
28.8
|
4.2–49.9
|
7.1
|
2.3–16.0
|
Creatinine, umol/L
|
358
|
45–1040
|
121
|
35–862
|
Urine PCR
|
387.0
|
31.1–8583.3
|
44.5
|
12.8–582
|
eGFR, mL/min/1.73
|
10
|
2–37
|
41
|
4–100
|
Hemoglobin, g/dL
|
8.0
|
4.1–10.9
|
11.6
|
7.3–13.7
|
Total leucocytic count
|
7.6
|
4.5–14.8
|
5.8
|
2.4–12.8
|
Platelet, 109/L
|
79
|
22–180
|
237
|
64–346
|
Haptoglobin, u/L
|
28
|
10–150
|
1230
|
390–2300
|
Lactate dehydrogenase, u/L
|
570
|
245–2991
|
208
|
141–379
|
Prothrombin time, sec
|
11.1
|
9.6–16.4
|
11.1
|
10.2–17.4
|
Partial thromboplastin time, sec
|
33.8
|
25.8–48.0
|
35.5
|
30.2–46
|
Thrombin time, sec
|
17.8
|
13.4–22.4
|
16.1
|
11.6–20.8
|
Fibrinogen, g/L
|
2.6
|
0.8–4.8
|
2.8
|
1.4–7.0
|
C3, mg/L
|
927
|
113–1370
|
960
|
240–1784
|
Results are expressed as numerical values, and medians (range) for continuous variables, unless otherwise indicated.
ALT: alanine aminotransferase; ALP: alkaline phosphatase; PCR: polymerase chain reaction; eGFR: estimated glomerular filtration rate; C3: complement
component 3; C4: complement component 4.
Classical pathway activities were performed in 11 (57.9%) cases and were in the range of 34–115% (reference range = 65–135%). Classical pathway dysregulation was reported in 11.0% of cases. Alternative pathway dysregulation was found in four (21.1%) cases with values in the range of 10–128%. Among patients with normal alternative pathway activity, one was already being treated with eculizumab. The test for C5b-9 membrane attack complex activity was performed in 14 (73.7%) patients, six of whom had elevated levels. Low complement factor H protein activity was found in six (31.6%) cases (120–500 ug/mL; normal: 284–528). Anti-factor H autoantibodies were found in five (26.3%) cases, range = 3–420 u/mL (normal: < 60). ADAMTS13 activity was normal in all cases.
Renal biopsy was performed in 14 (73.7%) cases for performing light microscopy, immunofluorescence, and electron microscopy. Ten biopsies were taken from native kidneys, of which nine were usable. Features of acute TMA were reported in five of the biopsied cases, a combination of chronic acute TMA in three, and chronic TMA in one. Three biopsies were taken from grafted kidneys, one of which showed a recurrence nearly one year post-transplant with mild acute TMA involving a few arterioles. There were no features to suggest rejection, and C4d was negative.
Of the 11 (57.9%) patients who underwent genetic testing, five (45.5%) had a known pathogenic variant in aHUS susceptibility genes, and four had variants of unknown significance (VUS). Homozygous full gene deletions for the susceptibility CFHR1 and CFHR3 genes were identified in patients 1 and 6, whereas patient 2 was heterozygous for this deletion mutation, making its role in the development of the HUS uncertain. Patient 4 carried a homozygous missense variant of unknown significance in the CFHR3 gene (c.209T>C). Patient 3 probably had PIGA-related normal pressure hydrocephalus with aplastic anemia related to a somatic duplication in the PIGA gene. Patients 5 and 8 were heterozygous for pathogenic variants in the CD46 (c.175C>T, p.Arg59*) and CHF (p.Arg1206Cys) genes, respectively. Other identified VUSs included the CFH heterozygous intronic variant (c.965-6T>C) with an unknown splicing effect (patient 5), as well as the CFHR5 heterozygous variant (c.1561T>A and p.Leu521Ile) (patient 6), THBD heterozygous variant (c.131C>T and p.Thr44IIe) (patient 7), and heterozygous variants in C3 (c.2901C >T and p.Leu967Leu) and CFH (c.3677C>A. p.Pro122Gln) genes (patient 9) [Table 4].
Table 4: The genetic analysis of Omani patients with atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS) (n = 9).
1
|
CFHR1, CFHR3
|
1q31.1del
|
Homozygous
|
AD/AR
|
Pathogenic, susceptibility alleles in the homozygous state.
|
2
|
CFHR1, CFHR3
|
1q31.1del
|
Heterozygous
|
AD/AR
|
Pathogenic, susceptibility allele, uncertain increase in risk in the heterozygous state.
|
3
|
PIGA
|
Whole gene duplication†
|
Hemizygous
|
Sporadic somatic mutations
|
Probably a somatic mutation that also explains the aplastic anemia identified in this patient.
|
4
|
CFHR3
|
c.209T>C, p.IIe70Thr
|
Homozygous
|
AD/AR
|
VUS
|
5
|
CD46
CFH
|
c.175C>T, p.Arg59*
c.965-6T>C
|
Heterozygous
Heterozygous
|
AD/AR
AD/AR
|
Pathogenic, susceptibility allele.
VUS
|
6
|
CFHR1,
CFHR3,
CFHR5
|
1q31.1del
c.1561T>A, p.Leu521Ile
|
Homozygous
Heterozygous
|
AD/AR
AD
|
Pathogenic, susceptibility allele in the homozygous state.
VUS
|
7
|
THBD
|
c.131C >T, p.Thr44IIe
|
Heterozygous
|
AD
|
VUS
|
8
|
CFH
|
p.Arg1206Cys
|
Heterozygous
|
AD/AR
|
Pathogenic, susceptibility allele.
|
This table excludes two patients whose results were negative. AD: autosomal dominant; AR: autosomal recessive; VUS: variant of uncertain significance.
†Duplication segment appears to be larger and involves several genes on chromosome X, but array comparative genomic hybridization was not done to define the
exact size.
Table 5 shows the pattern of treatment and the associated renal outcome and mortality at the three-month follow-up, then at the last follow-up, which had a median of five (1–7) years. Plasma exchange followed by eculizumab was the treatment strategy in 11 (57.9%). Complete renal remission was attained by seven (36.4%) patients while the remaining 12 continued to be dialysis dependent. Three patients underwent kidney transplants. Plasma exchange alone was the treatment for one patient, and plasma infusion was the treatment choice for another; the remaining three patients were managed conservatively. Three pediatric patients received eculizumab as first-line therapy. All three had complete hematological recovery and renal remission at the three-month follow-up, which they sustained at the last follow-up as well. Overall, there were four (21.1%) deaths, all attributable to the disease process.
Table 5: The treatments and the associated renal outcome (or mortality) among Omani patients with atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (N = 19).
Conservative treatment
|
3 (15.8)
|
0 (0.0)
|
1 (33.3)
|
2 (66.7)
|
0 (0.0)
|
0 (0.0)
|
2 (66.7)
|
1 (33.3)
|
PE/PI
|
2 (10.5)
|
2 (100)
|
0 (0.0)
|
0 (0.0)
|
0 (0.0)
|
2 (100)
|
0 (0.0)
|
0 (0.0)
|
PE and eculizumab
|
11 (57.9)
|
4 (36.4)
|
0 (0.0)
|
7 (63.6)
|
1 (9.1)
|
0 (0.0)
|
10† (100)
|
2 (20.0)
|
Results are expressed as numerical values and percentages for categorical variables unless otherwise indicated.
CKD: chronic kidney disease; ESRD: end-stage renal disease (requiring renal replacement therapy); PE: plasma exchange; PI: plasma infusion
†Three patients went for kidney transplants. Plasma exchange was given for 5–10 sessions and if the response failed, eculizumab was initiated (except for children).
See Table 3 for the three-month follow-up response.
Discussion
This is the first report of the clinical presentation and genetic results of adult and pediatric patients diagnosed with aHUS in Oman. Though the Omani population is known to have a high rate of consanguinity, this study failed to find a familial trend in the diagnosed cases.19
Some of our patients presented with peculiar unreported clinical manifestations, which imposed significant diagnostic and management challenges. Three patients had optic atrophy. This ocular manifestation is increasingly found in the literature but only as case reports.20,21 One of our female patients had cardiac involvement and continued to have volume overload and pulmonary edema. Her echocardiogram showed severe mitral regurgitation. This could stem from ischemia of chordae tendineae. A male patient had conjunctival hemorrhage. As his platelet level was 22 109/L, he was initially evaluated for possible hemorrhagic fever and his serology for rickettsia was positive. As aHUS is usually a thrombotic disease, his conjunctival hemorrhage could be attributed to thrombocytopenia or severe hypertension. Another patient who presented with clinical features of liver cirrhosis with portal vein thrombosis had to be managed conservatively due to diagnostic challenges.
In this cohort, complement activation and functional assay did not have a diagnostic value. However, low C3 levels were found in 31.6% of patients at presentation. This is similar to the findings of other studies, which have reported even more low-C3 incidence among patients with C3 or CFB mutations.8,10,14,21 Four of our patients who developed acute TMA post-kidney transplant had neither undergone native kidney biopsies nor investigated for donor-specific antibodies. The diagnostic challenge was the differentiation of the TMA from antibody-mediated rejection. Furthermore, two of these four patients had C4d positivity. Although only 11 of 19 patients in the current cohort underwent molecular genetic testing, the yield was relatively high. The most frequent pathogenic variant was in CFH gene, similar to the prevalence found among Caucasian populations.22–24
The identification of CFHR1 and CFHR3 gene deletions in the homozygous state further confirms their role in the pathogenesis of aHUS.25 However, molecular genetic testing of the cases in this study had been conducted over 12 years, at different laboratories that used different methodologies, which made the comparison of results not possible.
Another issue was the segregation analysis was not performed to assess the pathogenicity of VUS. Given the severity of aHUS in six of our patients with VUS, establishing the pathogenic relevance of these variants was of clinical importance. Five out of the six VUS were in CFH and all the six were in C3. A higher frequency of the C3 variant was reported in an Asian population.26 In this study, complete renal remission on the last follow-up was achieved in 50.0% of the patients who received eculizumab. This rate is similar to what was reported by Fakhouri et al.27
All seven patients who did not respond to eculizumab were adults with clinical evidence of chronic disease, two of whom had TMA in their renal grafts. Three of these seven patients passed away (patients no. 1, 2, and 8 in Table 4). Patients 1 and 2 had combined pathogenic mutation in CFH gene and factor H autoantibodies. Patient 1, a female, had a very aggressive disease course with extra-renal thrombosis, early recurrence of aHUS after kidney transplant and graft failure. On dialysis, she developed calcific uremic arteriolopathy and died five years after the diagnosis of aHUS. Patient 2 died after a massive ischemic stroke in the year of diagnosis. Patient 8 (adult male) was diagnosed with aHUS after kidney transplant and died following a stroke three months post-transplantation.
Eculizumab is reported to be effective against aHUS if initiated early.11,21,28,29 Persistence of hemolysis or lack of improvement in renal function after 3–5 daily plasma exchanges is a criterion for uncontrolled TMA and is an indication for initiating eculizumab.30 There are limited reports of eculizumab being used as the first-line therapy of de novo aHUS in native kidneys. Ohanian et al,31 reported the successful use of eculizumab as first-line therapy in a severe case of aHUS complicated by central nervous system involvement. In an open-label single-arm phase 2 trial, Fakhouri et al,29 reported discontinuation of dialysis in 79% of patients treated with eculizumab as first-line treatment.30 In the current cohort, eculizumab as first-line therapy in three cases of aHUS resulted in full recovery. The use of eculizumab as a treatment for secondary HUS is not yet established.26 One of our patients was positive for rickettsia, and despite treatment with doxycycline and plasmapheresis, he had a worsening course of aHUS and required intubation and intensive care unit care. After the first dose of eculizumab, dialysis was stopped and he was extubated. Genetic testing for compliments yielded negative results. Despite eculizumab’s lifesaving qualities, it remains out of the reach of most patients due to its prohibitive cost.
Rickettsia infection is known to cause AKI and is associated with poor renal outcomes.32 Postmortem examination of such patients has revealed features of TMA.32 Three of our patients received conservative treatment because they presented with established CKD and no features of active aHUS. One of them died three years after the diagnosis due to a stroke. Screening of recurrent aHUS post-kidney transplant and after initiation of dialysis is essential particularly if treatment with eculizumab is discontinued. Stroke is a serious vascular manifestation of aHUS that occurs suddenly and is hard to predict.12 Hence, for patients with aHUS who manifested with stroke or another serious cerebrovascular event one could make a case for a prolonged course of eculizumab treatment.
This study has the typical limitations of most retrospective studies. First, because the molecular genetic investigations of the participants had been conducted over 12 years, that too in different laboratories using different methodologies, their results could not be compared. Second, segregation analysis was not performed to assess the pathogenicity of VUSs. Third, this study documents only patients who sought tertiary care, potentially excluding many undiagnosed aHUS cases in the population.
Conclusion
The aHUS in Oman is a multiple-hit disorder, similar to reports elsewhere. The wide spectrum and multiple faces of presentation render this disease a significant diagnostic challenge, often delaying treatment. The identification of CFH1 and CFHR3 gene deletions in a homozygous state further confirms their role in the pathogenesis of aHUS. The VUSs were associated with aggressive disease and were likely to be pathogenic. Eculizumab is the key to suppressing complement activation, and where affordable, should be the first-line therapy and delivered as early as possible.
Disclosure
The authors declared no conflicts of interest. No funding was received for this study.
references
- 1. Ardalan MR. Review of thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA), and post-renal transplant TMA. Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl 2006 Jun;17(2):235-244.
- 2. Barbour T, Johnson S, Cohney S, Hughes P. Thrombotic microangiopathy and associated renal disorders. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2012 Jul;27(7):2673-2685.
- 3. Richardson SE, Karmali MA, Becker LE, Smith CR. The histopathology of the hemolytic uremic syndrome associated with verocytotoxin-producing Escherichia coli infections. Hum Pathol 1988 Sep;19(9):1102-1108.
- 4. Mele C, Remuzzi G, Noris M. Hemolytic uremic syndrome. Semin Immunopathol 2014 Jul;36(4):399-420.
- 5. Decludt B, Bouvet P, Mariani-Kurkdjian P, Grimont F, Grimont PA, Hubert B, et al. Haemolytic uraemic syndrome and Shiga toxin-producing escherichia coli infection in children in France. The Société de Néphrologie Pédiatrique. Epidemiol Infect 2000 Apr;124(2):215-220.
- 6. Joseph A, Cointe A, Mariani Kurkdjian P, Rafat C, Hertig A. Shiga toxin-associated hemolytic uremic syndrome: a narrative review. Toxins (Basel) 2020 Jan;12(2):67.
- 7. Alshaaili K, Al Salmi I, Metry A, Al Ismaili F, Hola A, Hannawi S. The epidemiology of hemolytic uremic syndrome: clinical presentation, laboratory findings, management and outcomes. Int J Hematol Blo Dis 2018;3(1):1-6.
- 8. Loirat C, Frémeaux-Bacchi V. Atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome. Orphanet J Rare Dis 2011 Sep;6:1-30.
- 9. Campistol JM, Arias M, Ariceta G, Blasco M, Espinosa L, Espinosa M, et al. An update for atypical haemolytic uraemic syndrome: diagnosis and treatment. A consensus document. Nefrologia 2015;35(5):421-447.
- 10. Noris M, Remuzzi G. Hemolytic uremic syndrome. J Am Soc Nephrol 2005 Apr;16(4):1035-1050.
- 11. Asif A, Nayer A, Haas CS. Atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome in the setting of complement-amplifying conditions: case reports and a review of the evidence for treatment with eculizumab. J Nephrol 2017 Jun;30(3):347-362.
- 12. Fidan K, Göknar N, Gülhan B, Melek E, Yıldırım ZY, Baskın E, et al. Extra-renal manifestations of atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome in children. Pediatr Nephrol 2018 Aug;33(8):1395-1403.
- 13. Gastoldi S, Galbusera M, Emlen W, Holers V, Banterla F, Donadelli R, et al. aHUS-associated genetic complement abnormalities cause C3 deposition on endothelial cells: protective effects of specific inhibitors of the alternative pathway of complement. Mol Immunol 2009;46(14):2850.
- 14. Caprioli J, Noris M, Brioschi S, Pianetti G, Castelletti F, Bettinaglio P, et al; International Registry of Recurrent and Familial HUS/TTP. Genetics of HUS: the impact of MCP, CFH, and IF mutations on clinical presentation, response to treatment, and outcome. Blood 2006 Aug;108(4):1267-1279.
- 15. Kavanagh D, Goodship TH. Atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome, genetic basis, and clinical manifestations. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program 2011;2011:15-20.
- 16. Goodship TH. Factor H genotype-phenotype correlations: lessons from aHUS, MPGN II, and AMD. Kidney Int 2006 Jul;70(1):12-13.
- 17. Blanc C, Togarsimalemath SK, Chauvet S, Le Quintrec M, Moulin B, Buchler M, et al. Anti-factor H autoantibodies in C3 glomerulopathies and in atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome: one target, two diseases. J Immunol 2015 Jun;194(11):5129-5138.
- 18. Al Salmi I, Metry AM, Al Ismaili F, Hola A, Shaheen F, Fakhoury H, et al. Epidemiology of human leukocyte antigens among Omani population. Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl 2017;28(5):1021-1026.
- 19. Gange WS, Haghighi A, Toy BC. Purtscher-like retinopathy associated with atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome: case report and review of outcomes. Retin Cases Brief Rep 2023;17(2):154-159.
- 20. Benvenuto F, Guillen S, Marchiscio L, Falbo J, Fandiño A. Purtscher-like retinopathy in a paediatric patient with haemolytic uraemic syndrome: a case report and literature review. Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol (Engl Ed) 2021 Nov;96(11):607-610.
- 21. Durkan AM, Kim S, Craig J, Elliott E. The long-term outcomes of atypical haemolytic uraemic syndrome: a national surveillance study. Arch Dis Child 2016 Apr;101(4):387-391.
- 22. Noris M, Caprioli J, Bresin E, Mossali C, Pianetti G, Gamba S, et al. Relative role of genetic complement abnormalities in sporadic and familial aHUS and their impact on clinical phenotype. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2010 Oct;5(10):1844-1859.
- 23. Fremeaux-Bacchi V, Fakhouri F, Garnier A, Bienaimé F, Dragon-Durey MA, Ngo S, et al. Genetics and outcome of atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome: a nationwide French series comparing children and adults. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2013 Apr;8(4):554-562.
- 24. Maga TK, Nishimura CJ, Weaver AE, Frees KL, Smith RJ. Mutations in alternative pathway complement proteins in American patients with atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome. Hum Mutat 2010 Jun;31(6):E1445-E1460.
- 25. Józsi M, Licht C, Strobel S, Zipfel SL, Richter H, Heinen S, et al. Factor H autoantibodies in atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome correlate with CFHR1/CFHR3 deficiency. Blood 2008 Feb;111(3):1512-1514.
- 26. Fujisawa M, Kato H, Yoshida Y, Usui T, Takata M, Fujimoto M, et al. Clinical characteristics and genetic backgrounds of Japanese patients with atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome. Clin Exp Nephrol 2018 Oct;22(5):1088-1099.
- 27. Fakhouri F, Hourmant M, Campistol JM, Cataland SR, Espinosa M, Gaber AO, et al. Terminal complement inhibitor eculizumab in adult patients with atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome: a single-arm, open-label trial. Am J Kidney Dis 2016 Jul;68(1):84-93.
- 28. Cofiell R, Kukreja A, Bedard K, Yan Y, Mickle AP, Ogawa M, et al. Eculizumab reduces complement activation, inflammation, endothelial damage, thrombosis, and renal injury markers in aHUS. Blood 2015 May;125(21):3253-3262.
- Fakhouri F, Delmas Y, Provot F, Barbet C, Karras A, Makdassi R, et al. Insights from the use in clinical practice of eculizumab in adult patients with atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome affecting the native kidneys: an analysis of 19 cases. Am J Kidney Dis 2014 Jan;63(1):40-48.
- 30. Legendre CM, Licht C, Muus P, Greenbaum LA, Babu S, Bedrosian C, et al. Terminal complement inhibitor eculizumab in atypical hemolytic-uremic syndrome. N Engl J Med 2013 Jun;368(23):2169-2181.
- 31. Ohanian M, Cable C, Halka K. Reduced dose maintenance eculizumab in atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS): an update on a previous case report. Clin Pharmacol 2011;3:45-50.
- 32. Conlon PJ, Procop GW, Fowler V, Eloubeidi MA, Smith SR, Sexton DJ. Predictors of prognosis and risk of acute renal failure in patients with Rocky Mountain spotted fever. Am J Med 1996 Dec;101(6):621-626.